Search for: "McNeill v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2011, 9:11 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Sentencing ACCA A federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:37 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McNeill, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 553 (27 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mamki, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 307 (08 April 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gentoo Group Ltd & Anor v Hanratty [2008] EWHC 627 (QB) (07 April 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) The Mayor of London, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:43 pm by brian
The question in this case concerns how afederal court should determine the maximum sentence for a prior state drug offense for ACCA purposes. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:40 am by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] unanimously ruled [opinion, PDF] on Monday in McNeill v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:40 am by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] unanimously ruled [opinion, PDF] on Monday in McNeill v. [read post]