Search for: "McWane, Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 11:00 am
The FTC previously settled similar charges against Sigma Corporation, and has also charged another industry competitor, McWane, Inc. with acting anticompetitively in the market for iron pipe fittings. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:43 pm
ODN is a Delaware corporation that owns and operates Oversee.net, a California corporation that engages in online marketing and advertising, specializing in selling, developing, and registering internet domain names. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:28 pm
The motion by defendants to stay the Delaware action in favor of the previously filed Florida action was based on the first-filed rule, explained in the doctrine announced in the Delaware Supreme Court decision of McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
The FTC's settlement with Star resolves charges that beginning in 2008 Star participated in an illegal conspiracy with McWane Inc. and Sigma Corporation to fix the price at which imported ductile iron pipe fittings are sold in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:56 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Solutia, Inc. and Pharmacia Corporation (Solutia & Pharmacia) appeal the District Court's grant of summary judgment against their claims under § 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:46 pm
In this regard, the Competition Bureau’s view in its Corporate Compliance Programs Bulletin is that “senior management’s clear and unequivocal support is the foundation of a credible and effective corporate compliance program. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
The FTC charged that the three companies, McWane, Inc., Star Pipe Products, Ltd., and Sigma Corporation, illegally conspired to set and maintain prices for pipe fittings, and that McWane illegally maintained its monopoly power in the market for U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm
The first-filed rule, sometimes called the McWane doctrine, was applied at page 16. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:05 pm
The Court also explains the first-filed rule, otherwise known as the McWane doctrine, based on the Delaware Supreme Court decision in McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
In addition, McWane has modified its corporate-wide stormwater pollution prevention plan and will develop or upgrade facility-specific plans as part of the agreement. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm
Cirrus: Claim Not "Junk Science" - San Mateo attorney Mike Danko on his Aviation Law Monitor Marketing 101: Lessons from Sarah Palin - Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Court of Chancery Dismisses Later-Filed Delaware Action Based on Forum Non Conveniens and McWane Doctrine - Wilmington attorney Francis G.X. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
See McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:43 pm
McWane, Inc., No. 08-41037 (5th Cir. 2010) [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:43 am
Wyandotte Chemicals Corporation, 455 F.2d 387 (5th Cir.1972). [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
The company, owned by the McWane family of Birmingham, was convicted of 20 felonies and fined $8 million. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
The company, owned by the McWane family of Birmingham, was convicted of 20 felonies and fined $8 million. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
This short blog overview assumes some familiarity with the first-filed rule--also known as the McWane doctrine. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Forum Non Conveniens Versus McWane Defendants argued that under McWane, the California actions were first-filed and the Delaware action should be stayed or dismissed. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
With respect to the remaining counts in the Complaint, the Court determined that under McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
After the Court reviewed the legal standard set out in McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. [read post]
