Search for: "Mccarthy, in Re" Results 1 - 20 of 1,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
As Kieran McCarthy has pointed out, in several of its recent opinions, including this one, the Northern District cited and relied on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in HiQ v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
By Kieran McCarthy Elon Musk may have done more to open the Internet to web scraping than any person or public interest advocacy group. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
Quite aside from the fantasy of dressing like men did in 1548, Guy shows it's also a fantasy to believe that men in suits these days are dressing like Cary Grant in 1948.I was especially interested in Guy's attention to the problem of a collar gap, because I was troubled to see that Biden was allowed to go on close-up camera last night at the Correspondents' Dinner with a giant gap between his shirt and his neck:  It's reminiscent of a ventriloquist dummy, notably… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 8:24 am by David Super
  He still probably dislikes the idea of re-opening deals, but this offer is not disrespectful, and accepting it would not establish a precedent that would necessarily degrade the value of future deals. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am by Chris Castle
Or more viscerally, the Man wants to cut off your dopamine, a drug you may not even know you’re addicted to. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am by Dylan Gibbs
McCarthy’s has a good primer on the Court of Appeal decision, if you’re interested.🏳️‍⚧️ Alberta is applying to intervene in the pronoun litigation headed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:12 am by Tom Joscelyn
One of them allegedly engaged in other disturbing behavior, including stalking then House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Congressman Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and former President Barack Obama. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The kicker here is that plaintiff did not try to re-plead the case and walked away from the case. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
Wayne Chang, Simone McCarthy, Nectar Gan, and Celine Alkhaldi report for CNN. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:06 pm by Dylan Gibbs
We’re now at 1,042 subscribers, which I couldn’t have anticipated when I started writing. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:19 pm by David Super
       In addition, the year of demonizing Senator Manchin effectively eliminated any chance he had of re-election. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm by Dylan Gibbs
With just under 7% of positions sitting empty, we’re no longer in uncharted territory. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Government officials have all too often enlisted private parties—from the White Citizens' Councils of the Jim Crow South to the blacklists of Communists in the McCarthy era—to punish those with whom they disagree. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:28 pm
A more deeply personal reason is that we’re all so busy leading our lives during middle age that we often are not particularly self-conscious about how we got to any given moment. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy There is a new most important legal precedent in the world of web scraping. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
  Justice Aylen has some scathing findings re other aspects of AC’s submissions:   [192] While this is sufficient to dispose of Access Copyright’s meritless assertion that participating in the tariff-setting process at all levels (before the Board, this Court, and the Federal Court of Appeal) constituted an offer to pay, the rationale for why the Plaintiffs would have participated sheds further light on the absurdity of Access Copyright’s assertion. [read post]
At an Axios event entitled “A Conversation on Battling Misinformation,” held on June 14, 2022, the White House National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy (“McCarthy”) blamed social-media companies for allowing misinformation and disinformation about climate change to spread and explicitly tied these censorship demands with threats of adverse legislation regarding the Communications Decency Act. [read post]