Search for: "Mcdonnell v. U.s.*" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2019, 9:51 pm by Patent Docs
Section 101 happenings, with topics including: • An overview of the important Section 101 case law from 2018, including the impact of Berkheimer v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
      I send thanks to Attorney Thomas McDonnell of the Pittsburgh law firm of Summers McDonnell for forwarding this interesting decision to my attention. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
The motion was granted because:First, the summary judgment record contained no direct or indirect evidence that Defendant had a discriminatory attitude in dealing with the Plaintiff;Second, Plaintiff did not establish on the summary judgment record that her job performance was satisfactory (the second element of a prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas protocol); andThird, Plaintiff did not establish that there were any employees who were not members of the protected class who were… [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court has issued a short orders list out of its Friday conference today.The one criminal case taken up is the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]