Search for: "Mcmillan v. Harris"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 8:28 am
The Jones v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
In Harris, we squarely confronted the question whether “McMillan stands after Apprendi. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Women First OB/GYN Associates, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:26 am
Harris v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Supreme Court in Alleyne v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
The continuing vitality of McMillan and Harris may be put to the test in a pending case at the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:17 am
New Jersey and Harris v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
This principle was established clearly by the Court in the 1986 decision in McMillan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 5:57 pm
US v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Suggesting a need on his part to accept Apprendi “at some point,” he asked if re-argument would be necessary were the Court to consider overruling Harris and McMillan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
” Justice Stevens expressed his “full agreement” with Justice Thomas and explained that in his view, McMillan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:21 am
Pennsylvania and Harris v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:43 pm
The Fast Food Edition – Seattle lawyer Dan Harris of Harris & Moure on the firm’s China Law Blog Law Firm Succession Planning-What Does the Future Hold? [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
Second, they argued that prosecutors withheld potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of the precedent set in Brady v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:42 pm
A Speech. - Seattle attorney Dan Harris of Harris & Moure on the firm's China Law Blog LexBlog Network Highlights More congratulations are in order as Jim Walker's Cruise Law News continues to climb the ranks in terms of popularity. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:16 pm
by Dawn McMillan; g. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
There is also a piece on the Reuters site, “Factbox: Why is Prince Harry giving evidence in court? [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
O’Brien concurrence that some future Court might overrule McMillan v. [read post]
