Search for: "Meade v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Bid Rejected for Reduced Sentence PursuantTo Guidelines Note Initially Adopted in 2001
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:50 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Meade argued that the bed described in the 908 claim must extend into the green. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:35 pm
See, e.g., Meade v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:07 pm
Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, et al. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
[1] For discussion of which statutes the Chevron test governs, see United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
<> EPA Awarding Close to $13 Million to Assist Small Drinking Water and Wastewater Systems Across the United States - U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Mead.) [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Joseph Palmore appeared next, on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of Chase. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:16 am
Michael V. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
" United States v. [read post]
