Search for: "Means v. City of Dayton" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am by MBettman
The dissent would find Davis was entitled to immunity, interpreting the law to mean Hauser’s only claim lies against the city, not a manager or supervisor. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:00 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently provided some much-needed clarification to the meaning of “Willful” with respect to violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, in the case of Dayton Tire v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:53 pm by Rob Healey
 The court accepted “Proposition of Law l(as formulated by Appellant, City of Cincinnati): State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:53 pm by Rob Healey
 The court accepted “Proposition of Law l(as formulated by Appellant, City of Cincinnati): State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
To reach this conclusion, this Essay starts by building off of Justice Pat DeWine’s dissent in Dayton v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by Lior Strahilevitz
  For example, in 1986 the California Supreme Court held in Long Beach City Employees Association v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:49 am
While, at first glance, H.B. 694 appeared to provide some practicality and legal cost savings by allowing a number of non-attorney agents to file real estate tax complaints, the Supreme Court of Ohio in Dayton Supply & Tool Co., Inc. v. [read post]