Search for: "Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co." Results 81 - 94 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Duphily, 703 A.2d 1202, 1209 (Del. 1997); Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 365 Md. 67, 775 A.2d 1218 (2001). [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 382 (5th Cir. 1978). [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 2:51 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 14 (1994) (quoting Senate Committee, Statement to the Senate Bill No. 199 [1960].) [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 6:07 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2 (1994)The first apparently problem with the State’s possible case against the website is that most of the statements posted on the website appear to be "opinions" rather than "facts. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 14 (1994) (quoting Senate Committee, Statement to the Senate Bill No. 199 [1960].) [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPKat),Spare part design protection: the European Parliament's view: (IPKat), (Catch us if you can)Cyprus fails to delight Turkey -  Cyprus is to gain PGI recognition for Turkish delight: (IPKat),Mewsings on the word ‘technical' (What does the EPO mean when it uses the word ‘technical'?) [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
In re Sears, Roebuck & Co., 96 UPSQ at 362. [read post]