Search for: "Means v. Stocker"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
The all-important “single right meaning” (i.e. what the reader would have understood Ms Stocker’s words to mean) was that Mr Stocker had tried but failed to kill Ms Stocker by compressing her neck. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 2:31 am
An ordinary reader of the post would have interpreted the post as meaning that Mr Stocker had grasped Mrs Stocker by the throat and applied force to her neck. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:17 am
He relied on the 1891 decision of Pullman v Hill, which involved the plaintiff’s clerk opening a letter intended only for him. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
The all-important “single right meaning” (i.e. what the reader would have understood Ms Stocker’s words to mean) was that Mr Stocker had tried but failed to kill Ms Stocker by compressing her neck. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
DISABLED EMPLOYEES DENIED REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONWalmart is alleged to have denied two deaf employees an “effective means of communication,” according to a lawsuit filed by U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
In Stocker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
A good example of this is Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2018] EWCA Civ 170; [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) in which the meaning of five words “he tried to strangle me” went all the way on appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:37 am
The plaintiff applied to be a stocker in Lowe’s Honolulu store. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm
The top ten new posts of the last quarter were as follows (in descending order) Top 10 Defamation Cases of 2018: a selection – Suneet Sharma Case Law: Grayling v North, Brexiteer ordered to pay philosopher £20,000 in libel damages for paedophile tweet – Iain Wilson Top 10 Privacy and Data Protection Cases of 2018: a selection News: Specialist Media Barristers’ Chambers One Brick Court announces dissolution Case Law: Linklaters LLP v Mellish, Protecting… [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 12:47 pm
The case is Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm
v) Is the pleading of meaning defective? [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm
Stocker v Stocker 29 February 2016, Trial, listed for 7 days (see the interim decision in June 2015 [2015] EWHC 1634 (QB)). [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller represented to Joe Stocker of First Bank that the David E. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 3:15 am
Bragg Creek v Tyco Integrated 2019 ABQB 226 https://t.co/zZ0mEsFTxp 2019-04-05 Letter to the Copyright Office on IT modernization status in light of the Fourth Estate decision https://t.co/uF1oGnu5Qk 2019-04-05 Case Law: Stocker v Stocker, Supreme Court overturns Judge on meaning of “tried to strangle” https://t.co/YOOlp3CNSc 2019-04-05 Open Banking & Data Ownership https://t.co/gLrAvzpLjW 2019-04-05 Blogger’s Screenshot of a… [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The court reiterated the principles as set out in Jeynes v News Magazine Ltd [2008] EWCA, Civ. 130, as affirmed in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
A welcome move away from the reasoning in Stocker v Stocker, in which the High Court and Court of Appeal held (before being overturned by the Supreme Court) that a woman had defamed her ex-husband in saying he tried to strangle her when it “was beyond dispute” that he had grasped her by the throat so tightly as to leave red marks on her neck visible to police officers two hours later. [read post]
