Search for: "MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc"
Results 101 - 120
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2009, 6:40 am
It has been stated that applicants abuse the system by filing divisional patent applications which incorporate new or revised claims to obtain multiple patents that all cover [*863] essentially the same invention. n35 In the case of MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 2:50 am
See MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 10:30 pm
Zurko, and Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
., Craig Allen Nard, The Law of Patents 34 (2008) (asserting PTO grants patents on 39% of applications); Brief of the Boston Patent Law Ass'n as Amicus Curiae in Support of Genentech, Inc., on the Merits at 5, Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:54 pm
MedImmune v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:43 pm
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 1163 (2007); and extended the patent exhaustion doctrine in Quanta Computer, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. et al. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
(IP Kenya) UK: Damages for observing patent injunction: Les Laboratoires Servier & Anor v Apotex Inc & Ors (IP finance) US/China: ‘Eli Lilly lobbies on counterfeiting and regulatory issues involving China’ (IP Dragon) US: Federal judge dismisses patent lawsuit filed by Human Genome Sciences against Genentech over patent related to type of protein that can be used to detect tumours (Law360) US: MedImmune seeks invalidation of… [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:29 am
Zurko, and Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:46 pm
The court held that the test, previously expanded by the Supreme Court in MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:45 pm
Supreme Court's holding in MedImmune Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 4:10 am
Genentech, Inc. decision. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 9:43 pm
Following the Federal Circuit's decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:29 am
Genentech, Inc., 127 S. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Genentech, Inc., 127 S. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 9:43 pm
For example, in Micron Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 3:24 pm
See also: Patent Baristas - Supreme Court High-Fives MedImmune, Wikipedia - MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:24 am
Genentech, Inc., 127 S. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
(July 8, 2008), the Tenth Circuit applied MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
