Search for: "Medical Associates Health Plan, Inc. v. CIGNA" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Taking time to make changes needed to find and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Taking time to make changes needed to identify and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:24 am by Maxwell Kennerly
According to a January article in the National Journal, six insurers alone—Aetna, Cigna, Humana, Kaiser Foundation Health Plans, UnitedHealth Group, and Wellpoint—pumped up to $20 million into the Chamber last year. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am by Jeffrey May
Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle Health System called off plans to merge after the U.S. [read post]