Search for: "Medical Board of California v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Proponents rally around the claim that opt-out systems are simpler, handle claims faster, involve fewer lawyers and are more expedient as a result.Injured worker advocates say all that these plans do is stack the cards against them.One of the key arguments made by the plaintiffs to the Oklahoma Supreme Court was that the dispute resolution process provided in alternative plans limit judicial or administrative review of claim denials, requiring an appeal to a committee of three members who… [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
California resource guide for cerebral palsy and individuals with special needs. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:49 am
A recent case, Krinsky v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 545; Guthrey v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
The County may also bring a civil action in Superior Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 8:03 pm
The Court rejected the effort to force non-statutory claims into arbitration; the court also found the arbitration provisions to be unconscionable.A California case, Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Association v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:06 am
Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 C3d 1, 21; Binder v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
In 2008, the California Supreme Court addressed this issue in Save Tara v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:57 am
Allergan USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[T]the FDA-approved labeling did, in fact, indicate that the approved dose of [the drug] was superior. . . . [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
Superior Court (Johnson) (2015) 61 Cal.4th 696 [California Supreme Court held that even prosecutors must comply with the Pitchess procedures if they seek information from confidential peace officer personnel records]). [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
The proposition was designed to ensure that “seriously ill” residents of the State have access to marijuana for medical purposes, and to encourage Federal and State Governments to take steps toward ensuring the safe and affordable distribution of the drug to patients in need. * * * *Respondents Angel Raich and Diane Monson are California residents who suffer from a variety of serious medical conditions and have sought to avail themselves of… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
“Strong” v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:07 am
District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
California’s law, for example, permits authorities to detain TB carriers who present a substantial likelihood of transmitting the disease to others, including those who refuse to take medication or follow infection control precautions. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
. . suggest[ed] a superior level of receptive language functions” and that her “measures of nonverbal domains including memory, spatial processing and nonverbal abstract reasoning” were above average. [read post]
16 May 2010, 3:00 am
“This was the primary factor that led the California Supreme Court in Tunkl v. [read post]
