Search for: "Medina v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
Medina General Hosp., 96 F.3d 830 (6th Cir. 1996)). [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:55 pm
Aug. 26, 2011)(per curiam opinion)(grant of more relief than requested, finality and partial summary judgment, harmful error analysis, exception to rule that ground must be stated in the summary judgment motion)G & H TOWING COMPANY, ET AL. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
AS-10-CV-860-XR, but my review of the docket on PACER indicates that United States District Judge Xavier Rodriguez ordered the case remanded to the 38th District Court of Medina County, Texas on June 27, 2011. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
The State contended that the voters lacked standing. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm
Combs, No. 08-1056 (Medina, J.) [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am
For a second day, media outlets are flush with analysis of Monday’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
Plata, it affirmed a decision by a three-judge district court panel ordering California officials to release state prisoners ; and in General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:23 am
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES. [read post]
Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn
13 May 2011, 3:33 pm
However, the arbitration section did not indicate whether state or federal law would apply, providing only that “[a]ll proceedings shall be conducted in the City of Dallas, State of Texas. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm
Medina, 68 M.J. at 590 (citations omitted); United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:39 am
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
Medina, 10-8003), and in the Sixth Circuit capital case (Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
