Search for: "Medina v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2). [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina–Lara from custody immediately. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Medina had a mistaken, but nevertheless good faith belief that the parties had agreed that he would take the children to the United States where they would attend school. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:39 am by Viking
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-632, and Johnson v. [read post]