Search for: "Medlin v. Grant" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008,” 37 J. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]