Search for: "Meeks v. State of Mississippi"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 9:06 am
Smith argued that the state of Mississippi, as it almost certainly did, excluded blacks from serving on his jury. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
Activists were able to secure therapeutic laws in some thirteen states,not simply in the South (indeed I'm not sure which Southern states Gene Burns is thinking of, since a quick look at David Garrow's book reveals that Alabama failed to pass any legislation, Texas law, of course, remained draconian [Roe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
Activists were able to secure therapeutic laws in some thirteen states,not simply in the South (indeed I'm not sure which Southern states Gene Burns is thinking of, since a quick look at David Garrow's book reveals that Alabama failed to pass any legislation, Texas law, of course, remained draconian [Roe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Finally, our longest-running relist, the state-on-top Mullenix v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Only three states still have separate courts of equity—Delaware, Mississippi, and Tennessee—though a handful of other states do draw some jurisdictional distinction between law and equity cases.[12] But in all fifty states “equity” remains part of the everyday vocabulary of courts and lawyers. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
Meeks and of counsel Paul A. [read post]
