Search for: "Melendez v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 9:20 pm
In their final footnote, the unanimous three-judge panel made a particularly important reference to Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
A variation of this issue was decided by the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Early last year, in State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:25 am
In the recent story by Sylvia Hsiehin in LawyersUSA on the ramifications of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:44 am
[Ideas/Atlantic] * Legal experts and prosecutors are grappling with the Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:38 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
United States, Apprendi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
FEC and Austin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:50 am
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Justice White explained how all this works with a special focus on the role of defense counsel in a concurring and dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:30 pm
Massachusetts OUI lawyers will continue to raise Sixth Amendment confrontation issues to challenge the admission of breathalyzer evidence at trial in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Melendez-Diaz vs. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
See SCOTUSBlog coverage here and opinion here.I think CAAF will need to re-look at the rule in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
The US Supreme Court today issued a new ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
The court issued its rulings this morning.A big win in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
From the November sitting: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:39 am
iStock_000004344594Small.jpg First Circuit decides that while evidence was sufficient to support convictions, the trial court's questioning was prejudicial and that the court's questioning introduced inadmissible hearsay, which required vacating the convictions and remanding the case for a new trial, in United States v. [read post]
