Search for: "Melendez v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:47 pm
Washington and Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
Several United States Courts of Appeals have held that "a defendant can open the door to the admission of evidence otherwise barred by the Confrontation Clause" (cites omitted). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
Several United States Courts of Appeals have held that "a defendant can open the door to the admission of evidence otherwise barred by the Confrontation Clause" (cites omitted). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:28 pm
(See Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:40 am
In Kingsaire, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Since Crawford, this practice has been limited, but hardly eliminated.Finally, there are forensic lab reports, as in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Since Crawford, this practice has been limited, but hardly eliminated.Finally, there are forensic lab reports, as in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
For example, in Melendez–Diaz v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:55 am
United States (No. 13-127) Walker v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:24 am
United States and Maxwell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
There is a strong semblance between this case and the 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
According to defendant, the admission of those records in evidence violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution under Crawford v Washington. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 7:40 am
Melendez-Diaz, 129 S. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:05 am
This revision seems to be a reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
