Search for: "Mellor v. Mellor"
Results 61 - 80
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
This appears to be in contrast with the finding of Mr Justice Mellor in InterDigital v Lenovo that all past infringements should be paid for (even if that involves ignoring limitation periods), as well as comments made elsewhere by Mr Justice Meade that liability arises from first use of the patented technology. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
These are both matters upon which Mr Mellor has placed particular reliance but I do not believe they take him very far. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
Wade and Bush v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 10:49 pm
Mr Mellor was forced to so submit. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Generously hosted by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP in its sumptuous London office, this was the latest talk in James Mellor QC’s ‘Jackanory’ series of IP updates. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
On the issue of her veganism as a protected characteristic, Employment Judge Mellor distinguished the application from the facts in Mr J Casamitjana Costa v The League Against Cruel Sports [2020] UKET 3331129/2018. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
OPPO and Optis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So held the Tenth Circuit on Tuesday in Sampson v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:49 am
Mr Justice Mellor called for judicial restraint in an interview last year, but I think the litigants will argue actively against it. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:32 am
What Judge Bacher said about the Huawei v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 11:22 am
Justice Mellor of the London-based High Court of Justice entered a consent order last week as a result of "the Claimant and the Defendants having agreed to settle the proceedings on the basis of a confidential agreement dated 11 March 2022. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 1:57 am
The ink is barely dry on Justice Mellor's InterDigital v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm
The starting point of the discussion will be the pending appeal before the UK Supreme Court in Thaler v Comptroller General [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:49 am
Mellor, 233 U.S. 718, 34 S. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
[State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
If those collection of words don't get you excited, then you probably have not been following the Rovi v Virgin Media litigation. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:16 am
Jones [2010], Mellor v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm
The recent injunction row, PJS v NGN is in many ways a sequel to the 2011 blockbuster – CTB v NGN and Thomas – set in the Super Injunction Spring, the story of Imogen Thomas, a former Miss Wales who had an affair with the Premier League footballer Ryan Giggs. [read post]