Search for: "Mendez v. May"
Results 21 - 40
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2021, 3:47 pm
” Mendez v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 3:59 am
Concur—Gische, J.P., Oing, Scarpulla, Mendez, JJ. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 7:41 am
Case citation: Hubay v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Nov. 5, 2020) and Mendez v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
In Tennessee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:22 am
June 17, 2020), Mendez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
Romanoff v Trustees of the Sheryl Romanoff Irrevocable Grantor Trust. 2020 NY Slip Op 31150(U) May 4, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157641/2014 Judge: James E. d’Auguste illustrates how the thicket grows. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am
Feb. 4, 2020) and Mendez v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
See Edward v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:39 am
• Frank V. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
This action, however, may highlight a growing concern the SEC has for digital tokens and their sale to investors. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:45 am
Like the Mendez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
So some would-be plaintiffs may have their not-yet-barred claim nixed by the SOL-shortening and may not have viable alternative theories of legal liability to avoid the harsh impact of the new rule, e.g., in a defamation case, which involves a 1-year limit. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 pm
’s recent decision dismissing a website accessibility complaint in Himelda Mendez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
If the termination date of service of the individual is made effective within a reasonable time of the last day of his or her probationary period, such as to coincide with the end of the next payroll period, the courts will not deem the probationer to have obtained tenure by estoppel as the result of the “carryover” [see Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612]. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
If the termination date of service of the individual is made effective within a reasonable time of the last day of his or her probationary period, such as to coincide with the end of the next payroll period, the courts will not deem the probationer to have obtained tenure by estoppel as the result of the “carryover” [see Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612]. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY Gonzalez v 3M took place in the Supreme Court of New York County, and was presided over by Judge Mendez. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY Gonzalez v 3M took place in the Supreme Court of New York County, and was presided over by Judge Mendez. [read post]
