Search for: "Mendoza v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm by S2KM Limited
Judicial Authority to Impose Structured Settlement - Release 60 features a recent New Jersey Superior Court case (Impink v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 6:10 am
FEC, Conflicts of interest, Institutional Investors, Pension funds, Political spending,Social capital, State law, Supreme Court Berkshire’s Blemishes: Lessons for Buffett’s Successors, Peers, and Policy Posted by Lawrence A. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Mission Statement: The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy (ASCE) is a non-profit, non-political organization incorporated in the state of Maryland in 1990. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The fact that the United States has issued a travel warning to citizens traveling to Michoacán, Mexico is insufficient to establish that Michoacán, Mexico is a war zone. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Supp. 3d 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) – to the extent that’s even possible under United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:31 am by Daily Record Staff
Mendoza filed a timely appeal and presents two questions for ... [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Cairns faces a charge of perjury after a 2012 libel trial in which he stated that he “never, ever cheated at cricket”. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:05 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Omission of factual determination On January 31, 2014, a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted Marvin Reyes-Mendoza of attempted first degree murder and related crimes in connection with his participation in a drive-by shooting. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:47 am
The sergeant handling the case stated that he did not intend to prejudice Beckmann or delay the proceedings but merely forgot to return the warrant.U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]