Search for: "Mendoza v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Most compelling in a review of the Mendoza-Martinez factors is that the State has a very important non-punitive purpose in enacting this designation provision and it has tailored a limited provision to deal with this purpose. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:27 pm by Jon Sands
  No, holds the 9th, because the state of the law at the time the state court decided the case was Oregon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
See Mendoza-Cepeda, 250 F.3d at 628 (recognizing that a consensual encounter may become a seizure); United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
Mendoza-Gonzalez, 363 F.3d 788, 793-94 (8th Cir. 2004), United States v. [read post]