Search for: "Menendez v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by Spencer Aronfeld
The trial court initially agreed with the family, by entering a judgement in their favor, but State Farm succeeded in getting the judge to rehear their argument and vacate the judgment based upon the newly-decided Florida Supreme Court case of State Farm v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
In light of evidence that a former nanny’s employers were aware of and disregarded federal and state minimum wage laws, sometimes paid her in cash, failed to record her hours, and made comments about her status as an alien, the Eleventh Circuit reversed a lower court erred that entered judgment as a matter of law against her (Davila v Menendez, June 10, 2013, Pryor, W). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:23 pm by admin
Celanese, ARB No. 09-118, ALJ No. 2008-SOX-064 (ARB September 28, 2011) (holding that whistleblower disclosures containing employer confidential information are protected under SOX when those disclosures contain original information evidencing the purported securities law violation); Menendez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:44 pm by James Hamilton
A DOL administrative law judge erred in concluding that a company’s breach of an accounting director’s confidentiality with regard to his complaint filed with the company’s audit committee was not an adverse action under Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protection provisions, ruled the DOL Administrative Review Board in Menendez v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm by Dan Bushell
  Among the new opinions released on Thursday, August 25, 2011 was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm by Dan Bushell
  Among the new opinions released on Thursday, August 25, 2011 was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
The legislation became effective upon signing, with the exception of sections which specifically stated a later effective date. [read post]