Search for: "Mercer v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1991)"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 2:22 pm
Department of Motor Vehicles (1991) 53 Cal.3d 753 that the term “drive” as used in Vehicle Code section 23512 (prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs), requires proof of “volitional movement. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:09 am
In the 1991 case of Mercer v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:55 pm
In 1991, the California Supreme Court in the case of Mercer v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:29 pm
In 1991, the California Supreme Court in the case of Mercer v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:01 am
Vecchio, LLC routinely defends those accused of driving without a license in Monmouth, Ocean, Middlesex, and Mercer counties. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 2:54 pm
In the 1991 California Supreme Court case of Mercer v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm
Department of Motor Vehicles in 1991 held that the word “drive” in California’s DUI law means that the defendant volitionally and voluntarily moved the vehicle. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm
Department of Motor Vehicles in 1991 held that the word “drive” in California’s DUI law means that the defendant volitionally and voluntarily moved the vehicle. [read post]
