Search for: "Merchant v State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm
Wayfair: can states collect sales tax from out-of-state merchants? [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:09 am
In Nagribianko v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Entertainment Merchants Association (08-1448). [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm
In the United States, merchants have challenged the fees in a seemingly endless series of antitrust cases, one of which (Visa v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
In Ohio v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:59 pm
Among the cases in my queue awaiting my analysis is Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm
In Ohio v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
The post Test Buys Don’t Create Personal Jurisdiction Over Amazon Merchant–Oceanside v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
The oral argument yesterday morning in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
Express Merchants’ Litig.), No. 06-1871 cv (2d Cir. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:58 pm
In Anderson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
He then stated that it was for this reason self-represented litigants were generally not entitled to costs. [2] 1465778 Ontario Inc. v. 1122077 Ontario Ltd., 2006 CanLII 35819 (ON CA) [3] Dabbs v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Cone Memorial Hosp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:25 am
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:24 pm
This overturned the previous rule from Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:17 am
The state no-surcharge laws are gone now, leaving only the card networks' merchant rules. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Judge Harold Baer in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:30 am
In 2018, the U.S. seizure of a merchant ship, M/V Wise Honest, at sea received international attention as a novel sanctions enforcement tool for deterring malign international actors—in that instance, North Korea. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:50 am
Merchant International Co Ltd v Natsionalna Aktsionerna Kompaniia Naftogaz Ukrainy: [2012] EWCA Civ 196; [2012] WLR (D) 51 “An English court was entitled to consider whether a foreign judgment obtained in a Convention state had contravened the Human Rights Convention where there was strong factual evidence to rebut the presumption that the procedures of other Convention states complied with article 6. [read post]
