Search for: "Merck "
Results 61 - 80
of 3,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In its complaint, Merck states that because it has patents, Medicare “cannot just manufacture its own versions of Merck’s drugs for beneficiaries; it must procure them from Merck. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:25 am
Merck’s best-selling asthma medicine, Singulair, has been linked for years to suicides and psychiatric problems, often in children. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:38 am
Both Merck (maker of Januvia, Janumet, and Keytruda) and BMS (maker of Eliquis and Opdivo) argue that the IRA is unconstitutional under the First Amendment because it compels speech and under the Fifth Amendment because it represents an uncompensated taking. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Like the 340B plaintiffs, Merck argues that the Medicare price negotiation program will coerce Merck into selling drugs at discounted prices. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:45 pm
The post Why One Healthcare Lawyer Thinks Merck’s Drug Pricing Lawsuit Defense ‘Makes No Sense’ appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 6:24 am
Merck addressed this very point: One of the things we have a real issue with on behalf of the songwriting community is data. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
Examples of the latter include the Bristol-Myers-Squibb – Celgene merger in 2018, and the Merck-Wyeth merger of 2009. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
Examples of the latter include the Bristol-Myers-Squibb – Celgene merger in 2018, and the Merck-Wyeth merger of 2009. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:21 am
Yesterday, Merck filed a complaint in the D.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
First, Merck raises a claim under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:03 pm
The Five Year Plan Merck Mercuriadis makes the good point that there is no time like the present to evolve: “In the United States, we have a position of stability for the next five years – at the highest rates paid to songwriters to date – in the evolution of the streaming economy. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:21 pm
The malware, which was delivered to Merck’s computers through accounting software developed by a Ukrainian company, allegedly spread to 40,000 Merck computers, caused more than $1.4 billion in losses and hurt Merck’s revenues. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:51 am
” In so doing, the court summarized the blocking patents doctrine as follows: In Merck and Galderma, we held that where market entry by others was precluded due to blocking patents, the inference of non-obviousness of the asserted claims from evidence of commercial success may be weak. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 11:03 am
Jim explains the state appellate court decision ruling that the NotPetya attack on Merck was not an act of war and thus not excluded from its insurance coverage. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Jim explains the state appellate court decision ruling that the NotPetya attack on Merck was not an act of war and thus not excluded from its insurance coverage. [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:31 pm
The Merck court faulted the exclusionary language as being ultimately too broad and not tailored to spe [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:07 am
The New Jersey Appellate Court affirmed the grant of insurance coverage for a cyberattack on Merck On leave to appeal, we consider whether plaintiff Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]