Search for: "Merrifield v. Merrifield" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 11:06 am
The link for yesterday's Tort Talk post on the case of Merrifield v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:55 am by written by Duncan, Linton LLP
In 2017, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision, Merrifield v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:09 pm
Here's some Ninth Circuit judicial activism that many Volokh readers will like: Merrifield v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:34 pm by David Greene
Of course not, and that’s why EFF filed an amicus brief in Lafayette City v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Toronto E&L Group
On March 15, 2019, The Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Merrifield v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:00 pm by Shane Todd
In Merrifield v The Attorney General (2017 ONSC 1333), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said there is a new, freestanding basis to sue for workplace harassment. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
The petition of the day is: Merrifield v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 1:13 pm by Allison Buchanan
In 2019, the Court of Appeal for Ontario declined to recognize a common law tort of harassment in Ontario in Merrifield v Canada (Attorney General)[1] but did not foreclose the possibility of future recognition in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:20 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    [1] Merrifield v Canada trial decision [2] Merrifield v Canada OCA The post Common Law as a Dynamic Process appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:20 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    [1] Merrifield v Canada trial decision [2] Merrifield v Canada OCA The post Common Law as a Dynamic Process appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:13 pm by brian
Former chief Judge David Brewer argued that Hilde's eyewitness ID was valid because, as proscribed by a 33-year-old Oregon law (State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:13 pm by brian
Former chief Judge David Brewer argued that Hilde's eyewitness ID was valid because, as proscribed by a 33-year-old Oregon law (State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lisa Stam
The tort of harassment was recognized in the 2017 Ontario Superior Court case Merrifield v. [read post]