Search for: "Merritt v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2012, 2:31 pm
I figure phones will be ringing off the hook tomorrow in some offices, so let me give you the fast and dirty breakdown of United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
The circuit concluded Smith abrogated Remmer in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:30 pm
Honchariw v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 1:49 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court just heard this week the Sixth Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
United States). [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 12:17 pm
John Turner v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:07 am
Petitioner’s counsel demonstrated the necessity of the long distance telephone calls, having included line items indicating the necessity of calling the United States State Department, an attorney in Mexico, the Mexican consulate, and Petitioner concerning the return of DFB to Mexico. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm
Petitioner’s counsel demonstrated the necessity of the long distance telephone calls, having included line items indicating the necessity of calling the United States State Department, an attorney in Mexico, the Mexican consulate, and Petitioner concerning the return of DFB to Mexico. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 2:53 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
Court cites United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:48 pm
But United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm
United States, 132 S. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:49 am
" United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog] Other United States v. [read post]
