Search for: "Merry v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
The only difference here is that, instead of Peninsula’s search results directly stating the name Peninsula, they include the part name. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:35 am
Area School Dist. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
That last case, United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Rudisill v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
In 1997’s United States v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Before the state bar could reach that conclusion, they would have to do more work to validate that the 236 entries are indeed misdirected, something this court punted on. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
Merry Christmas! [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 9:00 am
Then imagine this exchange: Prelude: When we last left our merry band of legal warriors, several were in Mariupol, Ukraine, repelling a Russian tank attack on the famous steel mill. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 9:34 am
The lawsuit, Jensen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Merry Christmas! [read post]
