Search for: "Messenger v Deem" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 2:52 pm by Meri Baghdasaryan
   In Telegram Messenger LLP and Telegram Messenger Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Union City Daily Messenger, Inc., 845 S.W.2d 162 (Tenn. 1992) (ruling that county employee who had substantial responsibility for and control over financial affairs of the county was a public official for purposes of defamation action against newspaper), Press , Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The key question is whether the plaintiffs can be deemed to have manifested their assent to the terms in the first place. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:57 am by John Jascob
(collectively, "Telegram") own and operate a mobile messaging app called Telegram Messenger. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:24 am by Christopher Walsh
The dissent concluded that the employer’s actions ran afoul of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s teachings in Stengart v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:49 am by Susan Brenner
During surveillance, agents observed Smith drive, along with Sahib Lewis, to Smith's residence and pick up a messenger bag. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
“While an entity must be authorized pursuant to state law to be within the ambit of the Open Meetings Law . . . , not every entity whose power is derived from state law is deemed to be performing a governmental function. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here in Messenger v Deem; 2009 NY Slip Op 29501 ;Decided on December 7, 2009 ;Supreme Court, Westchester County ;Giacomo, J. we see what turns out to be a total waste of time for everyone, including the jurors. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here in Messenger v Deem ; 2009 NY Slip Op 29501 ;Decided on December 7, 2009 ;Supreme Court, Westchester County ;Giacomo, J. we see what turns out to be a total waste of time for everyone, including the jurors. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"While an entity must be authorized pursuant to state law to be within the ambit of the Open Meetings Law . . . , not every entity whose power is derived from state law is deemed to be performing a governmental function. [read post]