Search for: "Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern California v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Interesting brief excerpt persuasively argues that "independent contractors" are equally entitled to indemnity under Labor Code section 2802
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
"‘[A]s a general rule, when "employee" is used in a statute without a definition, the Legislature intended to adopt the common law definition and to exclude independent contractors.'" Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern California v. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/