Search for: "Meyer v City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
We have aggressively pursued our client's speedy trial rights which has resulted in numerous dismissals in numerous questionable assault, gang assault and sexual assault cases in New York City and Westchester. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 4:32 pm
Citing Meyer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
An application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits filed by a New York City firefighter [Applicant] was denied by the Board of Trustees of the New York City Fire Pension Fund [Trustees]. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In contrast, mandamus "does not lie to enforce a task or duty that is discretionary" as demonstrated by the decisions in Alliance to End Chickens as Kaporos v New York City Police Dept., 152 AD3d 113, affd 32 NY3d 1091, cert denied, 139 S Ct 2651; and Matter of Meyer v Zucker, 185 AD3d 1265, lv denied 36 NY3d 904). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In contrast, mandamus "does not lie to enforce a task or duty that is discretionary" as demonstrated by the decisions in Alliance to End Chickens as Kaporos v New York City Police Dept., 152 AD3d 113, affd 32 NY3d 1091, cert denied, 139 S Ct 2651; and Matter of Meyer v Zucker, 185 AD3d 1265, lv denied 36 NY3d 904). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78, an applicant [Petitioner] for accidental disability retirement benefits sought judicial review of a determination of the Board of Trustees of the New York City Fire Department Article 1-B Pension Fund [Board] where the Board’s decision denying Petitioner’s application for accidental disability benefits was the result of a tie vote.The Appellate Divisions sustained the Board's decision, citing Canfora… [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78, an applicant [Petitioner] for accidental disability retirement benefits sought judicial review of a determination of the Board of Trustees of the New York City Fire Department Article 1-B Pension Fund [Board] where the Board’s decision denying Petitioner’s application for accidental disability benefits was the result of a tie vote.The Appellate Divisions sustained the Board's decision, citing Canfora… [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court should clarify whether agency has discretion to ignore any and all costs in designating Endangered Species Act habitat [Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer on Cato certiorari amicus in Building Industry Association of the Bay Area v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:27 am
Leicht v Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 11:53 am
"The State Comptroller is the sole trustee of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:57 am
" New York v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 90 NY2d 139, the Court of Appeals, indicating that a New York City firefighter is entitled to ADR benefits after a medical examination and investigation shows that the firefighter is physically or mentally incapacitated for the performance of city-service "as a natural and proximate result of an accidental injury received in such city-service. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 90 NY2d 139, the Court of Appeals, indicating that a New York City firefighter is entitled to ADR benefits after a medical examination and investigation shows that the firefighter is physically or mentally incapacitated for the performance of city-service "as a natural and proximate result of an accidental injury received in such city-service. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v… [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:47 am
City of New York, a summary order issued on April 30. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Kamins, the president of the New York City Bar Association, and Daniel R. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Kamins, the president of the New York City Bar Association, and Daniel R. [read post]
