Search for: "Meyer v. Grant" Results 101 - 120 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2019, 8:47 am by Chris Castle
According to Wired (“Don’t believe the hype: Article 13 is great news for YouTube“), YouTube is positioned to be a big winner due to the Article 13 requirement for “upload filters”. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
In contrast, a New York district court recently upheld an arbitration clause in Coinbase’s account registration process and granted its motion to compel arbitration concerning claims brought by a user (Sultan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
In its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 considered in the contested decision and resubmitted those requests as main request and auxiliary requests I to V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Clark, 125 A.D.2d 868 [friendship with District Attorney required granting of for cause challenge]; People v Meyer, 78 AD2d 662, 664 [2d Dept 1980] [limited social acquaintance and a business relationship with the prosecution witness created implied bias requiring exclusion]; People v Wlasiuk, 90 AD3d 1405, 1412 [3d Dept 2011] [juror failed to disclosprofessional relationship as coworker to victim]). [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LLC v Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris  Ledva & Meyers, LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 32019(U)  August 17, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 153477/2016  Judge: Carol R. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[USA] v Johnston, 145 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2016]; Matter of Barnes v Venettozzi, 135 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1184-1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:10 am
The Third Circuit recently issued a fascinating sexual harassment opinion in Minarsky v. [read post]