Search for: "Meyers v. Price"
Results 41 - 60
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 1:31 am
One of the consequences of these price controls is that the entry of a generic product onto the market results in an immediate, and irreversible, 16% drop in the price that the government will pay for the drug. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 6:54 pm
No. 75,370; 1/10/07); Opinion: Keller, P.J.; Joined by Meyers, Price, Keasler, and Hervey. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
In an unflinching dissent, Judge Price (joined with Judges Meyers, Johnson, and Holcomb) stated: By dint of persistence, a plurality of the Court purports to overrule Clewis. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Bonnette v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Publicity Rights The court says the parties agree that someone violated Urban Meyer’s personality rights (apparently assigned to OSU) by selling items on Redbubble. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:36 am
” Meyer v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
Lagarde, 2008-CA-01480-COA (Dec. 15, 2009) Meyer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:06 am
Ground B ‘Mr Meyer’s economic adjustments’ are considered to be merely a possible consequence of success on Ground A ([136]). [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
In Smith v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
In Smith v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:27 am
” Vectura Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Looking at the totality of the circumstances, Joseph knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his rights under Article 38.22 and Miranda.Judge Meyers was joined in his opinion by Judges Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, and Cochran. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
Presiding Judge Keller, along with Judge Price, concurred to say that without the conversation, the defense failed to establish a violation of Article 36.22. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:03 am
According to the dissent, this case was like Vennus v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 3:31 am
The case, State v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:45 pm
Back in 2010, I posted about Mahaffey v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
The always feisty Judge Meyers dissented to again express his belief that the second prong of Strickland should not apply to ineffective assistance claims at punishment. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
"Judge Price concurred, along with Judge Johnson and Judge Holcomb. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Urgenda Foundation Niccolò Ridi, United States—Anti-dumping Measures Applying Differential Pricing Methodology to Softwood Lumber from Canada Piotr Uhma, Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18 Hannah Woolaver, R v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:00 am
Judge Price also authored a concurring opinion, joined by Judge Meyers because the Court reached the right result, but he wanted to write a dubitante opinion to express his reservations about whether the use of the "eighth-grade grammar test" worked in this case. [read post]
