Search for: "Meyers v. Price"
Results 61 - 80
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting 2016: Clarifying liability in hub-and-spoke conspiracies
4 May 2016, 10:08 am
’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by passengers alleging a price-fixing conspiracy that involves both horizontal and vertical agreements (Meyer v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
Supreme Court’s 1939 ruling in Interstate Circuit v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
Supreme Court’s 1939 ruling in Interstate Circuit v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:36 am
” Meyer v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Since there's lots of dancing at weddings, and there are lots of same-sex weddings going on nationwide, this is a fine day to read Heather Bussing's Religion v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am
” In commentary for the Cato Institute, Ilya Shapiro and Randal Meyer note that the Court’s decision in Horne “has far-reaching implications for the continuation of all the New Deal-era price controls. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:48 am
FINRA alleged that Johnson engaged in a manipulative scheme to inflate the market price and trading volume of IWEB. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:36 am
A court ruling has revealed that the Commonwealth of Australia (i.e. the Federal Government) is seeking to recover $60 million it considers has been ‘overpaid’ for the anti-clotting drug marketed by Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) and Bristol-Meyers Squibb under the brand name PLAVIX: Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi-Aventis [2015] FCA 384.Sanofi was the owner of Australian Patent No. 597784, which includes claims directed to the compound having the international… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Right-to-Work — via Ross Runkel Report Union Isn’t Liable For Members’ Posts To Private Facebook Group–Weigand v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
Woodman’s Food Market, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
’” (Meyer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:43 am
Chief Justice John Roberts asked this question of Assistant Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky during oral argument earlier this week in Mach Mining v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
” In re Bristol Meyers Squibb Co. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Bonnette v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:14 am
Meyers Professor of Law and Business at Stanford Law School. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 pm
See also, e.g., Meyer v. [read post]
