Search for: "Meyers v. Price"
Results 121 - 140
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
Lagarde, 2008-CA-01480-COA (Dec. 15, 2009) Meyer v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:46 am
" Kevin Thompson ("FTC v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:03 am
According to the dissent, this case was like Vennus v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Meyer, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC Moderator: William J. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
I’m delighted to respond to Nell Minow’s thoughtful and interesting testimony on the Citizens United case. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Let me say at the outset, some of my prior beliefs. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
Today the CCA handed down published opinions in the following cases:PD-1205-08, State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
Well, except for the fact that Illinois v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Well, um, in Miles v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am
Judge Price, joined by Judges Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, and Cochran, first set out that testimonial statements are statements that an objective witness would reasonably believe would be available for use at a later trial. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am
Consequently, his subsequent claim should be procedurally barred.Judge Meyers dissented without an opinion. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Looking at the totality of the circumstances, Joseph knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his rights under Article 38.22 and Miranda.Judge Meyers was joined in his opinion by Judges Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, and Cochran. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
"Judge Price concurred, along with Judge Johnson and Judge Holcomb. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
The always feisty Judge Meyers dissented to again express his belief that the second prong of Strickland should not apply to ineffective assistance claims at punishment. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
Presiding Judge Keller, along with Judge Price, concurred to say that without the conversation, the defense failed to establish a violation of Article 36.22. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
[Presumably this concurrence went to press before Price was able to read Arizona v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 12:55 pm
Meyer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:10 am
Lawyers in the 1970s and 1980s used to get a percentage of the sale price as a fee for a typical closing. [read post]
