Search for: "Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
Peters (mineral leases)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:05 pm
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Missing from the table, according to interviews and e-mail messages, were Miccosukee Indian tribe members, some of whom live in the Everglades; the Florida Crystals Corporation, the other major landowner in the area; and the federal agencies that partner with the state on restoration efforts. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, that transfer of water within a single body of water cannot constitute a “discharge” for purposes of the Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, that transfer of water within a single body of water cannot constitute a “discharge” for purposes of the Act. [read post]
