Search for: "Michael B. Martin vs State of Florida"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JERICHO STATE CAPITAL CORP. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Cheerleading vs. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
The Big Problem with the Small Penis Rule: Why It Does Not Limit Defamation Liability, Michael Conklin, Angelo State University. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
In Martin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Open licensing vs monopoly controlled supply: (KEI), Protecting inventions involving biofuel feedstock: (IP Law360), Brazil: ‘Public interest’ factor in Brazil’s patenting system: (Spicy IP), EU: Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 on advanced medicinal products to enter into force soon, creating certification procedure regarding quality and non-clinical data: (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
" For example, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina all provide natural experiments in the effects of changes in carry licensing laws. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
The Queen of England continues to be our official figure-head of state. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
avd/quotes/nls/avd (AVD 6.94, +0.07, +1.02%) today announced that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has denied the Company’s motion for emergency and injunctive relief from a Stop Sale, Use or Removal Order that had been issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency relating to the Company’s USEPA-registered pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) product line. [read post]
