Search for: "Michael Brooks v. State of Mississippi" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 1:46 pm by John Floyd
Michael West, a dentist and forensic odonotologist. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jones, Johns Hopkins University, delivered the Gilder-Jordan Lecture at the University of Mississippi on September 17. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Mississippi is the seventh state to ban gender-affirming care. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center, 513 N.E.2d 387, 393 (Ill. 1987). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center, 513 N.E.2d 387, 393 (Ill. 1987).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Mo Brooks, January 6, and the Effort to Overturn an Election, (Nov. 9, 2021) 12. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
  A number of states that have passed anti price-gouging legislation have recognized the disadvantage of the ambiguous standard and have opted for more specific standards in the form of percentage-caps or no-increase laws. [read post]