Search for: "Michael C. Duff" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2012, 3:08 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Blackmail: Michael Jordan’s Paternity      David Letterman and Child Support C. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
McGarity, Michael C. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm by Elim
Anthony 2003 Link The Law of Sentencing Manson, Allan 2001 Link The Law of Torts, Fourth Edition Osborne, Philip H. 2011 Link The Law of Torts, Third Edition Osborne, Philip H. 2007 Link The Law of Torts, Second Edition Osborne, Philip 2003 Link The Law of Trusts, Second Edition Gillese, Eileen E. 2005 Link The Law School Book: Succeeding at Law School, Third Edition Hutchinson, Allan C. 2009 Link The Law School Book: Succeeding at Law School, Second Edition Hutchinson, Allan C.… [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:57 am by Michael Geist
As Canadian Heritage Minister Melanie Joly’s consultation on Canadian content in a digital world nears its conclusion – comments are due by November 25th – the big issue remains how to pay for an ambitious culture agenda. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Duff, University of Wyoming College of LawLisa Duggan, Social and Cultural Analysis, NYUCynthia Fuchs Epstein, Graduate Center,CUNYStephen M. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Coffing Hoist Division, Duff-Norton Co., 528 A.2d 590, 591 (Pa. 1987); Azzarello v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm by Sasha Volokh
” Similarly, Michael Walzer writes, “[t]he critical exposure is to profit-taking at the prisoners’ expense, and given the conditions under which they live, they are bound to suspect that they are regularly used and exploited. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-Norton Co., 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987)(evidence of industry standards are inadmissible in strict products liability actions) Davis v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
  “Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed, vindicated, and continued. [read post]