Search for: "Michael Crowell"
Results 61 - 80
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 4:49 pm
Freeman and Michael M. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:32 pm
As UNC professor of government Michael Crowell points out, if a party's dress seems to represent religious beliefs and the court is concerned about it, the court should inquire further. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:14 pm
Crowell & Moring and Arnold & Porter also represent AT&T in the case. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:00 pm
House of Representatives Michael Waldman - Executive Director, Brennan Center for Justice Liza Goitein - Liberty and National Security Project Director, Brennan Center for Justice Emily Berman - Counsel, Brennan Center for Justice Government transparency is vital for a well-functioning democracy. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Further dispute resolution know-how comes from Crowell & Moring dispute resolution specialist Flip Petillion, an arbitrator and WIPO panellist, and another Katfriend of long standing, Judge Michael Fysh QC, who has jumped ship as it were and shifted, following his retirement from the bench, from traditional litigation to mediation.The link to this event's web page can be found here. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:42 am
Moderator: Loretta Tuell, Greenberg TraurigSpeakers:Alex Skibine, Professor, College of Law, University of Utah Scott Crowell, Crowell Law Office -Tribal Advocacy Group Paula Hart, Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs – Office of Indian Gaming Steve Bodmer, Deputy General Counsel, Pechanga Tribe 2:30 pm Ethics What are the ethical considerations of representing opposing factions in tribal government disputes? [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:41 am
Break (hosted by Crowell Law Offices) 10:30 a.m. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:57 pm
.
Crowell & Moring Adds Group From Buchanan Ingersoll
New York Law Journal
Washington, D.C.'s Crowell & Moring has recruited an eight-lawyer financial institutions practice, led by William M. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:09 am
My colleague Michael Crowell frequently teaches sessions on the law of contempt. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:32 am
My colleague Michael Crowell wrote a fascinating blog post here on whether retention elections are consistent with the state constitution, including an intriguing discussion of a similar issue arising in Tennessee, where the entire state supreme court recused itself from hearing the matter and a “special supreme court” was convened. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:13 am
My former colleague Michael Crowell prepared this useful paper about what gets North Carolina judges in trouble. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
My colleague Michael Crowell is quoted in the news article as saying that a “court needs to be sensitive to religious issues in imposing dress requirements in the courtroom. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:13 am
Before the 1960s, as my colleague Michael Crowell explains here, thousands of local courts scattered throughout North Carolina were presided over by judges who were paid by the fees they collected. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:13 am
My former colleague Michael Crowell prepared this useful paper about what gets North Carolina judges in trouble. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 6:26 am
I also recommend my colleague Michael Crowell’s detailed exploration of the issue, here. [read post]
23 May 2014, 5:41 am
(Recall that last session saw an effort to abolish the judgeships in one fell swoop, leading my colleague Michael Crowell to post this analysis of the legislature’s authority, or lack thereof, to abolish the jobs of sitting judges.) [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:09 pm
My (ostensibly retired, but still productive) former colleague Michael Crowell wrote this article last August recounting the History of North Carolina Judicial Elections. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:46 am
Crowell; Special Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael B. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:46 am
Crowell; Special Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael B. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
Michael Crowley and Josh Gerstein have a recent piece summarizing some of the legal and policy uncertainty within the USG concerning the proper response to the alleged North Korean hack of Sony. [read post]
