Search for: "Michael Everett v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm by WSLL
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Meri V. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am by Amy Howe
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Michael Mukasey and Mary McCord suggest that Chandler v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” In the Penn Program on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Michael Knoll suggests that the court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome… [read post]