Search for: "Michael Gerhardt" Results 121 - 140 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2007, 2:56 pm
With the exception of some work by Michael Gerhardt, that is true with respect to both political scientists and law professors. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 9:56 am by Deborah Heller
The democrats invited Professors Noah Feldman, Michael Gerhardt, and Pamela S. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The year 2019 is ending with the great rifts--opened in 2016, exposed in 2017, and acquiring a greater urgency and revealing the power of its consequences in 2018--now exposed. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H.… [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H.… [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am by Joshua Matz
Research Professor of Law University of Virginia School of Law Michael Gerhardt Burton Craige Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence UNC School of Law Stuart Gerson Trustee Society for the Rule of Law Aziz Huq Frank and Bernice J. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Michael Gerhardt, a leading scholar on the federal impeachment process, explains that impeachment is a “political process designed to investigate, expose, and remedy political crimes committed by a special class of politicians subject to unique political punishment. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H.… [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Michael Gerhardt, another leading expert on impeachment, similarly points out that "It certainly makes no sense for presidents who commit misconduct late in their terms, or perhaps not discovered until late in their terms, to be immune from the one process the Constitution allows for barring them from serving in any other federal office or from receiving any federal pensions. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
Thus, as Professor Michael Gerhardt has written, the Privileges or Immunities Clause is the "natural textual home . . . for unenumerated fundamental rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Michael Grynberg, DePaul University College of LawThick Marks Thin MarksMark might be strong but receive weak protection based on nature of claim, such as nominative fair use. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:30 am by Bob Bauer
For example, it is inconsistent with the analytical scheme that Charles Black set out in his 1974 “Handbook” and with the judgments of more recent scholarship such as Michael Gerhardt’s. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
  Tony Mauro of the BLT reports that Professors Michael Gerhardt (the University of North Carolina) and Orin Kerr (George Washington University) will advise members of the Senate Judiciary Committee in preparing for confirmation hearings. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:15 pm
Professor Michael Gerhardt has written an article in 2000 called "The Federal Appointments Process," and I think he has given some advice to our Democratic friends in the past and, maybe recently, about the confirmation process that we're engaged in today. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 5:28 am by jonathanturley
Here are the ten developments that I cited as justifying an impeachment inquiry (a view with which my fellow witness University of North Carolina Professor Michael Gerhardt disagreed): The record currently contains witness and written evidence that the President (1) has lied about key facts in these foreign dealings, (2) was the focus of a multimillion-dollar influence peddling scheme, and (3) may have benefitted from this corruption through millions of dollars sent to his family… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:55 am by SHG
The other two, Standord’s Pam Karlan and UNC’s Michael Gerhardt agreed. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Constitutional Arrogance Tuesday, January 26, 2016  |  Eric Schlabs Speaking during the opening session of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review’s 2015 Symposium, Professor Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina Law School and the National Constitution Center argued that the presidency, as an institution, is “peculiarly designed” to stretch the boundaries of its power. [read post]