Search for: "Michael Gray v. D & G, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
ATI Technologies, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices (Patently-O) E D Wisconsin: When can a digital file be a ‘product’ under Section 271(g)? [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Potential Changes to Fund of Funds Arrangements Posted by Thomas Hiller, Brian McCabe, and Edward Baer, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Friday, February 1, 2019 Tags: Exchange-traded funds, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, Investor protection, Risk management, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Section 12(d), Securities regulation The Latest on Proxy Access Posted by Holly J. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Travel Caddy, Inc (not precedential) (Gray On Claims) (PATracer) (Patently-O) CAFC: Egyptian Goddess clogs up the CAFC: International Seaway Trading Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
Gray v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(Docket Report) (Gray on Claims) District Court S D Illinois: False Marking: ‘The Court does not need to be notified every time a judge makes a decision in one of those cases’: Mudge v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.; McNamara v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp (Gray on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Qui tam plaintiff cites Professor Crouch’s question to readers as proof that patent expiration dates are not readily ascertainable: North Texas Patent Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Bassani Manufacturing (TTABlog) District Court S D New York: The City owns ‘Tavern on the Green’: City of New York v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Bassani Manufacturing (TTABlog) District Court S D New York: The City owns ‘Tavern on the Green’: City of New York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Bodum, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Prudent’ filing of second suit not sanctionable: DH Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but… [read post]
