Search for: "Michael Jones v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 8:02 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence – Burglary, assault and reckless endangerment A jury in the Circuit Court for Frederick County convicted Michael Jones, appellant, of first-degree burglary, first and second-degree assault, and reckless endangerment. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:50 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Gun possession by disqualified person Appellant Michael Walter Jones was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Carroll County of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, two counts of possession of cocaine, possession of a shotgun after having been convicted of a crime of violence, ... [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:45 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Life sentence In 1989, Michael Jeffreys, appellant, was convicted of the first-degree murders of Anthony Jones and Reginald Brown, as well as other related offenses, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
In the last blog entry, the Fourth Amendment Right to Privacy implications of the United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:59 am
Swire (New York University School of Law and Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
In some instances, like in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Perry, Judge.Representing Jones: Michael H. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:12 pm
Waxman Chief Defense Lawyer Quinn Jones... [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a Jones Act seaman’s claims for negligence and unseaworthiness, confirming that the seaman’s burden is not weightless. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
No. 09–0146 STATE OF IOWA v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:50 pm
Jones and Riley v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a Jones Act seaman’s claims for negligence and unseaworthiness, confirming that the seaman’s burden is not weightless. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:25 am
by Michael J. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:20 am
For publication opinions today (2): Carls Jones v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:31 am
Jones and, for the moment, Zervos v. [read post]
