Search for: "Michael Kun"
Results 61 - 80
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 2:19 pm
By Michael Kun Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:27 am
Kun and Jeffrey H. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
By Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen To the surprise of few, the California Supreme Court has decided to review the Court of Appeal’s decision enforcing a class action waiver in Iskanian v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
By Michael Kun It appears that oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
By Michael Kun Some were beginning to wonder whether it would ever happen. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:09 pm
Busk opinion, issued today, our colleague Michael Kun at Epstein Becker Green has posted “Supreme Court Holds That Time Spent in Security Screening Is Not Compensable Time” on one of our sister blogs, Wage & Hour Defense. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:56 pm
Our colleagues Michael Kun and Jeffrey Ruzal at Epstein Becker Green have a Wage & Hour Defense Blog post that will be of interest to many of our readers: “Unusual Wage Payment Issue in 2015 for Many Employers: 27 Bi-Weekly Pay Periods, Not 26. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm
Our colleague Michael S. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:31 pm
Our colleague Michael S. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:51 am
Our colleague Michael Kun, attorney at Epstein Becker Green, has a post on the Wage & Hour Defense Blog that will be of interest to many of our readers in the retail industry: “Clarification of California’s Obscure ‘Suitable Seating’ Wage Rule Likely to Lead to More Employers Providing Seats – and to More Class Actions Against Those Who Don’t. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
Our colleague Michael S. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:51 am
Our colleague Michael Kun, attorney at Epstein Becker Green, has a post on the Wage & Hour Defense Blog that will be of interest to many of our readers in the hospitality industry: “Clarification of California’s Obscure ‘Suitable Seating’ Wage Rule Likely to Lead to More Employers Providing Seats – and to More Class Actions Against Those Who Don’t. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:53 am
Kun and Kevin D. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:19 am
By Michael Kun If employers with operations in California believed that they could not possibly face more wage claims than they already do, they can think again. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:26 pm
Our colleague Michael S. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:06 pm
Busk opinion, issued today, our colleague Michael Kun at Epstein Becker Green has posted “Supreme Court Holds That Time Spent in Security Screening Is Not Compensable Time” on one of our sister blogs, Wage & Hour Defense. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:54 pm
Our colleagues Michael Kun and Jeffrey Ruzal at Epstein Becker Green have a Wage & Hour Defense Blog post that will be of interest to many of our readers: “Unusual Wage Payment Issue in 2015 for Many Employers: 27 Bi-Weekly Pay Periods, Not 26. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
Panken, Michael S. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:02 pm
Busk opinion, issued today, our colleague Michael Kun at Epstein Becker Green has posted “Supreme Court Holds That Time Spent in Security Screening Is Not Compensable Time” on one of our sister blogs, Wage & Hour Defense. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
Our colleague Michael S. [read post]
