Search for: "Michael M. v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
K M Imports Inc. (2014 ONSC 1889) the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded a company which imports Caribbean food into Canada libel damages of Can$50,000. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
In terms of important case law, there is the forthcoming Supreme Court hearing of Rakusen v Jepson in January – the issue being whether a rent repayment order can be made against a superior landlord of the property or only the direct landlord. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:49 am by INFORRM
Academic There is a new article entitled The Limits of Tort Privacy, by Neil M. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 8:04 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Consider the 2014 Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Children’s Aid Society of London and Middlesex v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:56 am by Ken White
Superior Court and Court of Appeals, which act like state courts everywhere else, and the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by David Bernstein
” As Michael Munger points out in a comprehensive review of the book, “desegregation seems an odd choice for MacLean to emphasize. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
 BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Supreme Court to hear case on inducing patent infringement: Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
I don’t know if I’m surprised by the result of the opinion, but an opinion that interested me lately was an Oregon Supreme Court decision entitled Patton v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Brian Gallini
After all, forthcoming Supreme Court guidance seems unlikely given that the Court has not heard a juvenile interrogation case since Fare v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Brian Gallini
After all, forthcoming Supreme Court guidance seems unlikely given that the Court has not heard a juvenile interrogation case since Fare v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
This is essentially how the civil suit arose: Plaintiff Juror Number One was the jury foreperson in a trial in Sacramento County Superior Court (`the criminal trial’) before the Honorable Michael P. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Superior Court, alleging that Simberg’s and Steyn’s commentary defamed him. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
McGinley of the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas ruled similarly in the case of Serulneck v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by Avery Schmitz
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]