Search for: "Michael Ramsey" Results 81 - 100 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 9:22 am by Michael Geist
The post Canadian Position on Data Localization Rules in Trade Deals Revealed: Protection for Government Data Only appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:53 am
"Another Twist in the Emoluments Litigation": Michael Ramsey has this post at "The Originalism Blog. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Professor Solum also has a some reflections on Professor Gienapp's latest and a reply by Michael Ramsey. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm by Ilya Somin
Several prominent war powers scholars reached similar conclusions in a recent symposium on on Trump’s action, including originalists Michael Ramsey and Saikrishna Prakash. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 8:06 am by Randy Barnett
San Diego law professor Michael Ramsey then published these thoughts about Steve’s claim that originalists claim that the “‘original public meaning”‘of constitutional provisions can be recaptured with . . . [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:50 am by NCC Staff
Michael Ramsey is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law and Director of International & Comparative Law Programs at the University of San Diego School of Law. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 2: Proxies for Distinctiveness; Proving Distinctiveness (and Secondary meaning); Strength of a MarkDo current doctrinal tests properly assess actual consumer reaction to purported marks? [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:56 am
Ramsey, Constitutional War Initiation and the Obama Presidency Current DevelopmentsSean D. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 11:10 am by Ilya Somin
Originalist legal scholar Michael Ramsey offers a strong response. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:15 am by John Mikhail
’”As Michael Ramsey notes, this embrace of originalism as the only suitable and definitive mode of constitutional analysis is a surprising and perhaps ill-advised posture for Trump's lawyers to adopt in these circumstances. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:15 am
A direct response to Ramsey’s 72-hour policy, the bill was designed to shield the names of officers involved in shootings. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  "Roger Brooks Taney Was as Bad as You Think"; Michael Ramsey on Seth Barrett Tillman on the Presentment Clause.If you're missing out on this year's meeting of the American Society for Legal History, you can follow the conversation on Twitter. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Gautham Rao
Robert Baker (Georgia State), Lou Williams (Kansas State), Kate Masur (Northwestern), Joanna Grisinger (Northwestern), Melissa Macauley (Northwestern), Kathleen Brosnan (Oklahoma), Rena Lauer (Oregon State), Kathlene Baldanza (Penn State), Craig Hammond (Penn State), Emily Blanck (Rowan), Rebecca Rix (Princeton), Jack Rakove (Stanford), Susan Hinely (Stony Brook), James Gigantino (Arkansas), Peter Larson (Central Florida), Victor Bailey (Kansas), Abigail Firey (Kentucky), Daniel Gargola (Kentucky),… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Michael Froomkin (Miami), Shubha Ghosh (Syracuse), Eric Goldman (Santa Clara), James Grimmelmann (Cornell), Edward Lee (IIT), Lyrissa Lidsky (Florida), Lisa Ramsey (University of San Diego Law School), Jorge Roig (Charleston), David Sorkin (John Marshall), and myself: Based on our experience as law professors who are knowledgeable about the application of the First Amendment to Internet law, we urge you (pursuant to Rule 8.500(g)) to accept the Petition for Review in this case. * *… [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Michael Froomkin (Miami), Shubha Ghosh (Syracuse), Eric Goldman (Santa Clara), James Grimmelmann (Cornell), Edward Lee (IIT), Lyrissa Lidsky (Florida), Lisa Ramsey (University of San Diego Law School), Jorge Roig (Charleston), David Sorkin (John Marshall), and myself: Based on our experience as law professors who are knowledgeable about the application of the First Amendment to Internet law, we urge you (pursuant to Rule 8.500(g)) to accept the Petition for Review in this case. * *… [read post]