Search for: "Michael S McConnell"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,016
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
This year, I publicly challenged Will Baude and Michael McConnell to a debate on Section 3! [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:48 am
HLR case comments are about the case, but they're also about the big ideas behind the case, and one exemplar of that is Michael McConnell's famous case comment from 1997: Institutions and Interpretation: A Critique of City of Boerne v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
McCoy said Freeman’s clients could seek an exemption. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:22 am
Michael Rose reports for Reuters. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:59 pm
I will add that, prudentially, keeping Trump off the ballot, and infuriating his die-hard supporters, would be much worse for American democracy, anyway, than would be another term of Joe Biden as Michael McConnell pointed out in a post on this blog in response to my initial post.The post Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Marci Hamilton and Michael McConnell discussed he Founders and religious liberty at the National Constitution Center (YouTube). [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:40 pm
" Stanford law Professor Michael McConnell made a similar point in our recent televised debate on Trump and Section 3. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:02 am
Ilya Somin, Steve Calabresi, Will Baude, and Michael McConnell (and see also Jonathan Adler's post citing Prof. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 1:52 pm
Hoover Senior Fellows today include, among others, many leading economists, historians, political scientists, natural security scholars, and other academics, including law professors Richard Epstein, Jack Goldsmith, Daniel Kessler, and Michael McConnell. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
(p. 40)As Baude and Paulsen advance this argument--both in the excerpt above, and in responding to McConnell's critique--they tend to treat concern over consequences as something distinct from a theory of interpretation. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
" But other critics contend that disqualifying Trump is, as Stanford Law Professor Michael McConnell puts it, likely to have "profoundly anti-democratic" consequences, depriving voters of the opportunity to vote for the candidate of their choice….. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
In two episodes totaling about three hours we talk about many aspects of the argument about Section Three, including various issues of federal jurisdiction, congressional power over the electoral count, our reactions to the recent blog post here by our friend Professor Michael McConnell, and more. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Chapman & Michael W. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:10 am
[Bloomberg Law News] * Mitch McConnell froze again. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
McConnell stared straight ahead, and the aide asked reporters to give them a minute. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:55 pm
It has "played no significant role in American governance since 1872 and was regarded by many scholars as moribund," legal scholar and former federal Judge Michael McConnell wrote. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
McConnell, “Excluding Epidemiological Evidence Under FRE 702,” For The Defense 18 (June 2023) [Castile]. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Another conservative legal critic, Stanford’s Michael McConnell, suggested it is dangerous to exercise the law as laid out in the Constitution as perhaps all political protests could suffer. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:57 am
Times expressing strong disagreement with the Baude-Paulsen view of Trump’s disqualification under section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment–and aligning himself with Michael McConnell’s and Eric Segals’s critiques of the Baude-Paulsen view: “My concern is that not… Continue reading The post “When the Law Is Not a Trump Card” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
