Search for: "Michael S. Kun"
Results 341 - 360
of 450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
Panken, Michael S. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
Panken, Michael S. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
Panken, Michael S. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
Panken, Michael S. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 2:12 pm
Bloom, a partner in the Boston office of Jackson Lewis LLP and Michael Kun, a partner at Epstein Becker & Green in Los Angeles, to discuss their book, The Baseball Uncyclopedia: A Highly Opinionated, Myth-Busting Guide to the Great American Game. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
by Michael Kun The workplace used to be a lot easier to manage. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 2:29 am
Bloom and Michael Kun, authors of the book, The Baseball Uncyclopedia: A Highly Opinionated, Myth-Busting Guide to the Great American Game. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 12:23 pm
By Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen Agreeing with the recent federal district court opinion in our case Alonzo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:06 pm
Because the case was handled by our EpsteinBeckerGreen colleagues Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen, we do not believe it is appropriate to comment on the decision or its implications. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:06 pm
Because the case was handled by our EpsteinBeckerGreen colleagues Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen, we do not believe it is appropriate to comment on the decision or its implications. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:06 pm
Because the case was handled by our EpsteinBeckerGreen colleagues Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen, we do not believe it is appropriate to comment on the decision or its implications. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:06 pm
Because the case was handled by our EpsteinBeckerGreen colleagues Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen, we do not believe it is appropriate to comment on the decision or its implications. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:36 am
By Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen Agreeing with the recent federal district court opinion in our case Alonzo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:27 am
by Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen Already besieged by wage-hour lawsuits, employers with operations in California may see more of these cases, or may be brought into wage-hour litigation where they might not have been before, as a result of a new decision by the California Supreme Court expanding the definition of "employer. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
By Michael Kun As we have written before in this space, the latest wave of class actions in California is one alleging that employers have not complied with obscure requirements requiring the provision of “suitable seating” to emploees – and that employees are entitled to significant penalties as a result. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
By Michael Kun As we have written before in this space, the latest wave of class actions in California is one alleging that employers have not complied with obscure requirements requiring the provision of “suitable seating” to emploees – and that employees are entitled to significant penalties as a result. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
By Michael Kun As we have written before in this space, the latest wave of class actions in California is one alleging that employers have not complied with obscure requirements requiring the provision of “suitable seating” to emploees – and that employees are entitled to significant penalties as a result. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:51 am
By Amy Traub, Michael Kun, and Anna Kolontyrsky As employers know, not only are FLSA collective actions more prevalent than ever, but they can be costly to defend or resolve. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
By Michael Kun As we have written before in this space, the latest wave of class actions in California is one alleging that employers have not complied with obscure requirements requiring the provision of “suitable seating” to emploees – and that employees are entitled to significant penalties as a result. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:12 am
By Michael Kun As we have written before in this space, the latest wave of class actions in California is one alleging that employers have not complied with obscure requirements requiring the provision of “suitable seating” to employees – and that employees are entitled to significant penalties as a result. [read post]
